臺兒莊會戰

The Battle of Tai'erzhuang began today March 24th. It was part of the larger Battle for Xuzhou that would see its climax in May. This was mostly the Japanese underestimating the fighting spirit of the common rural farmer.

Two Generals Li Zongren and Bai Chongxi had plans to encircle the Japanese forces at Tai'erzhuang. The Japanese were over confident and overlooked flaws in their plans.

New mp3s, laws, a book, a name and the end to the war

Greetings all!

Boy there's a lot for me to unload. I'll start with that particular image. The Apple. As in Apple Macintosh, the accursed (and yes, I know they are good for the graphically inclined) maker of macs. Suffice it to say, I've never been a fan. Don't get me wrong. I've used them but usually at schools who bought them cheaply because Apple thought it would incite parents to buy them for their children. This idea never really caught on and Macs have remained the red-headed stepchild for years. And just like like the proverbial sibling, they're really flashy but lack substance.

My reason for vilifying Apple know no limits. I detest iPods and even more so, itunes. Why? Well, besides the fact that there are better mp3 players out there that get a whole lot less press (and don't have the slick and snazzy marketing campaign), I just don't like the idea of an apple product in my home (I do have to admit I own a couple of Apple accessories that work on PCs). I also think itunes is revolting due to the fact that I cannot control the content I purchase in the same way if I bought the hard copy itself. I can download it but it will only play in itunes unless I burn it onto a cd, then rerip it on to my pc. Ugh....

I own a Dell Desktop and a Gateway laptop. Not that I'm a fan of those brands either but they aren't macs. Frankly, the Dell is only a Dell in name only (the insides are mine, I just use the case). I own a 30GB Creative Zen Vision: M which sadly is nearing the end of its life. I also am a suscriber to eMusic. If you haven't heard of this site, check it out. They are not about contemporary pop music like Akon and Christina Aguilera. Rather they specialize in independent and less popular genres like jazz, classical and older shite that is cool. True Audiophiles move past current music in search of the obscure aan forgotten. I will listen to everything. To look at my library is a test of endurance. It runs from Bach's organ music to Japanese rap to Glenn Miller and gothic. I even have a slew of environmental sounds, old radio plays and soundtracks. I have a cd library to match and consider myself legal. Some stuff was downloaded back in the day but I've since moved past that. EMusic has helped me build a library of big band, folk and even polyphonic music. EMusic has grown to add audiobooks.

But itunes was still the place to go for current music like the aforementioned Christina Aguilera. I say was... because on September 25th, Amazon started up its on wing of mp3 downloads (and its in Beta). They offer songs at $.89-$.99 apiece. This is a competitive price since Apple's itunes is roughly the same. However, where Amazon rules is the album pricing. It runs about $8.99 or less for current drivel and $6.99-$7.99 for the stuff I'm currently interested in like Bing Crosby, the Dale Warland Singers and Debussy (don't ask about Debussy. Actually, I'll tell you as a classical music buff that classical is a very seasonal genre. Listening to Debussy and other late Romantic composers in the fall is best. Stravinsky, Saint-Saens, Rimsky-Korsakov, Shostokovich, some Chopin, non Nutcracker and 1812 Tchaikovsky, Holst, and Ravel are great listens in October. Debussy's Claire de Lune sparkles regardless of the season, however. Stravinsky's Firebird Suite is excempt from the autumn as it is a spring juggernaut. You'll note the lack Germanic composers though Chopin was Polish (as was Tchaikovsky, too). Most composers on the list are Russian or French... I'm getting away from my point). This is music to my ears. They are DRMless and better yet, highly mobile! I've already downloaded a bunch of Dale Warlad, Anonymous 4 and 4 cds worth of ol' Bing. His non-Christmas stuff. I'll attack Count Basie tomorrow! Regardless I couldn't be more thrilled. To add to my already enormous World War II collection is a treat.

Moving on, I actually have really become absorbed by the war. The war as in World War II. It begs the question. We are currently embroiled in a rather unpopular war that requires little sacrifice for the civilians other than those whose send loved ones to fight. There are no war bonds to buy, no metal to salvage and ration books to use. And yet, without the hardships of the 40's, we complain. Gas prices are too high, FEMA is a mess and the press is a confusing mash of ambitious political hacks. Its no wonder I dream of Edward R. Murrow, Winston Churchill and FDR fireside Chats.

But like nationalist sentiment and the allure of scratched, sepia-toned photos, there is something wrong with my fascination with the War. It was not a romantic time. It has been romanticized through film, song and anecdote. Vietnam vets looked longingly at that war and wished theirs had been like it: Just, right and necessary. What hurts is that there isn't such a thing. War is dirty, rotten, hellish, surreal and agonizing. No one, conquerer or conquered comes out without some rather nasty scars. World War II left many and its a shame that we lose so many veterens every year. They are wonderful people who sacrificed so much and deserve our undying respect.

Regardless, we look at it without the reality of what the sense can truly tell you. Looking at photos of crematoria at Auschwitz without really seeing it begins to become a problem when Holocaust deniers begin to get attention. We need to continually re-evaluate the war and its effects on the world we know. We need to look at it without the romanticization of time. With the romance comes mythology and eventually the war becomes not how and who fought or even why, but what we imagine it was and idealize it to be. Otherwise it will become like Victorian age. We have glossed over the human suffering that took place in the name of the Industrial Revolution. We read Dickens now and forget how very real the conditions were.

Because of this, I was glad that Ken Burns made The War. In 7 installments we look at the war through the eyes of those who lived it and experienced it. I had never known about the slaughter of Nazi soldiers near Normandy as they were trying to retreat. It is so obscure that it is difficult find any documentation. Anyways, those who didn't watch it... what's wrong with you? It will be replayed. View it just for the poetic and elegant Sam Hynes of Minnesota (the Woodrow Wilson Professor of Literature Emeritus I might add. He taught at Princeton after getting his PhD!). Listening to his words alone makes it worthwhile

While I go through reading books on the war and listening to its music, I also am reading up on its slang. There's a book out called FUBAR (which I might add looks similar to the US Army's FM 21-76: the Survival, Evasion and Recovery Field Manual). In here are not only the American GI and Gyrene slang but the British & Aussie as well as German, Russian and Japanese. There are some interesting entries such as Khaki-Whacky and cackle fruit. The oft-argued about and aptly, the book's title, FUBAR is included. It states in the text that it stands for Fucked Up Beyond All Recognition. There are several arguments about this term. One being that it is Fucked Up Beyond Any Recognition or All Repair or Reason. I was raised by two Sailors who both were raised by former military men. It was always All Recognition to me which by the way I learned at a very young age ;).

But here's a conundrum: was it really used in WWII? My father maintains that it was not. He claims it was coined in Vietnam. A good many things were coined in 'Nam but I never believed him. It gets mentioned far too many times in film and literature alike prior to Vietnam to be from there. The book does not shed any light on this perplexing mystery. However, in the introduction, author Gordon L. Rottman (somewhat ironically named) asserts that many terms predate the war and were coined during the American Civil War or in other countries. Well, thats a different frame of mind. No one had ever thought it might be older than the War! He also mentions that terms were from various other walks of life and professions such as farming even! Again, not a possibilty in my mind. Usage seemed so entrenched in World War II lore that I failed to envision a very different circumstance to its birthing.

I began to do a search for the origins of the fabled FUBAR. SNAFU, the name of this blog, was also included in this search (And in case you do not know what SNAFU means, it is Situation Normal (or Nominal as a good Marine might say), All Fucked Up.) In Google Answers, it says that it came from the Fuchtbar. THis I find hysterical as there is a plot within the World War II-era film Saving Private Ryan where Captain Miller's rangers tell the translator they're saddled with that FUBAR is German. Poor kid looks it up but cannot find it!

"Lieutenant Dewindt: FUBAR.
Private Reiben: FUBAR.
Sergeant Horvath: FUBAR.
Captain Miller: FUBAR
Private Jackson: Y'all got that right.
Corporal Upham: I looked up fubar in the German dictionary and there's
no fubar in here."

It also states that phone booth repairmen used it when they went out to sites to communicate over less then preferable quality back to their bosses. FUBAR and SNAFU were easily heard and quickly said. I wanted more corroboration than Wikipedia however. I continued but I could find no other reference for this storied beginning to the overused term. I did find it interesting that Wikipedia listed other R-words that also turn up such as rescue, recovery, reality, and redemption.

I also found an interesting entry: SUSFU. This is related to FUBAR and SNAFU. SUSFU means Situation Unchanged: Still Fucked Up (By the way, I haven't been saying Fouled instead because it was Fucked. Get over it!). I was wondering about changing the name of this site to SUSFU. Things haven't changed despite the sweeping elections of democrats last year who were dedicated to bringing our troops home from the war. Problem isn't that they can't get things done. The war cannot end. Not as we envision it. It may take decades which frightens me to tears. It may end as it did in Vietnam with a helicopter atop the embassy and Bing Crosby's White Christmas being the signal to drop everything and scram.

I don't know. I'll give it some thought. I'm going to bed. Turning in.... Smoking Lamp is out!

God responded and other wackiness

Among all the hubbub of returning to school this fall, I managed to break my hand. Yes, my hand. I hit someone on the side of his or her head with my hand and am now paying for it (literally).

Tonight in my first post in three weeks or so, I want to address the whole thing about Moveon.org. Apparently, no one can do just that: move on. The ad itself while rather uninspired ("Hey, Petraeus rhymes with Betray Us!!!" "That's brilliant!!!!!!") and off target. Lets set something straight. Military figures are not politicians. When they leave the service they may then feel free to pull an Ike and run for office, even the highest in the land. Until then, there are as much a part of the chain of command as the grunt who hauls a 60 lb pack and a rifle. He's taking orders from the Commander-in-thief... I mean chief.

Moveon.org is attacking the wrong guy. He's stuck having to fight a war that even he may not agree with. Sevice people are citizens, too. They do not think the same and no one should ever categorically assume that all service men and women are therefore gun toting, conservative yahoos. Anyone who's served a day in the armed forces will tell you that there are as many varying beliefs, opinions and ideologies as there are in the civilan world. Never take for granted that a soldier is there completely by choice. Signing up means you follow orders regardless of your ideas but unable to express them To attack someone who cannot freely express their own heart and mind do to the role they have is sheer rudeness and dispicable.

I've said my peace on that (mistake intended) and lets put this puppy to bed!

Next week, the United Nations will once again begin its General Assembly for reasons unknown to anyone with brain cells to rub together. If you must ask why, read the UN charter. I even linked it for you because I'm such a nice caring person... Ban Ki-Moon and all the rest will show up for hopefully, another circus. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the current President of Iran will be in New York again despite last year's outright weirdness (Do I need to remind people of Chavez and his "devil" talk?). Ahmadinejad, beyond being short and an excellent modern Napoleon wannabe, asked to be able to visit Groud Zero in New York to pay his repects. New York officials denied his request citing safety concerns since the site is now a construction zone. Way to go New York!

Beacause I want to keep this post short I will refrain from talking about Bush's supposed B in Econ 101 (word on the street says it was a C-). I will, however, discuss a recent lawsuit brought about by a Nebraska State Senator named Ernie Chambers on September 14th. This senator was incensed to discover a lawsuit being brought by an accuser in a sexual assault case. During the case, the words "victim" and "rape" were barred from the proceedings. The victim, as it were, has now sued saying her right to free speech was infringed upon.

Mr. Chambers took it upon himself to file a lawsuit against God. Thats right! The One, the Almighty, the great I Am. According to Chamber, he can sue God in Douglas County, his home county where Omaha is, because God is everywhere. Chambers also waived personal sevice i.e. notifying Him of said suit, because God is omniscient. He already knows.

Specifically in the suit, God is accused "of making and continuing to make terroristic threats of grave harm to innumerable persons, including constituents of Plaintiff who Plaintiff has the duty to represent." In addition, God has caused (though I'd prefer the words allowed or enabled over caused) "fearsome floods, egregious earthquakes, horrendous hurricanes, terrifying tornadoes, pestilential plagues, ferocious famines, devastating droughts, genocidal wars, birth defects, and the like." (Nice use of allitereration! Woeful Wars might have been cooler).

And it doesn't end there. God further takes it on the chin with this scathing diatribe against God (probably Morgan Freeman) of "calamitous catastrophes resulting in the wide-spread death, destruction and terrorization of millions upon millions of the Earth's inhabitants including innocent babes, infants, children, the aged and infirm without mercy or distinction." Never accuse God of being too random.

Well, God spoke back (or is it spake?) At any rate, God says that Chambers cannot sue anybody as his frivolous lawsuit is supposed to prove. He also added in the response that Chambers missed a very important point particularly concerning blaming him for human oppression and suffering. According to God "I created man and woman with free will and next to the promise of immortal life, free will is my greatest gift to you." Apparently there was another response that listed a phone number for a law firm in of all places, Corpus Cristi.

I have nothing witty to add to this. Its funny enough on its own but in an intellectual way. I would like to, however, say a few things about the case that brought this about. The woman who brought about the suit has a case. Here's why: the case of her "assaulter" ended in mistrial because the surrounding publicity damaged the prosecution's chances of getting an impartial jury. Since she also couldn't speak freely in the court to lay her claim of assault against another, she and the prosecution were effectively gagged. This amounts to a judge who would rather control how a case is tried rather than interpret the law and ensure that justice is served.

I also want to add that calling someone a victim in a trial does not absolutely mean that the defendent victimized the accuser. He may be proven otherwise. However, there is still eveidence that the victim was victimized. That cannot be disputed.

As much as I could rant till I'm actually in Nebraska, I must move on... hee hee....

On Sunday, a new Ken Burns' documentary is premiering on PBS. It is called simply The War and it details events as seen through orinary people who fought or assisted in World War II. As most of those close to me know, I am obsessed with World War II. I invite all who have the chance to view this. War stories are rarely told and even more rarely heard. In fact, less so since 1,000 World War II vets die everyday. But worse than this, a majority of high school graduating seniors believe the US fought with Germany against the USSR. Now thats just BAD!!!!!!

Now onward toward history (can those two words be used together like that?)

On this Day, in 1780, Benedict Arnold became Benedict Arnold by giving the British the plans to West Point. Who was he before you ask? He was benedict arnold.

In 1765, Antoine de Beauterne claimed to have killed the mysterious wolf-like creature called the Beast of Gévaudan (French: La bête du Gévaudan). The beast continued its horrific attacks all the same.

On this day, in 1897, The New York Sun published the letter stating "Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus". The editorial is now the most republished editorial in the English Language.

J.R.R. Tolkein published The Hobbit in 1937. Geeks and free thinkers would forever feel its fantastical pull. But really, bedtime stories would never be the same.

And in 1991, after decades of oppression and before that, genocide, Armenia is independent of the USSR which ceased to exist shortly thereafter.

Happy 4th of July

I'm just not even apologizing....

Today is our nation's birthday. I try to take the time every year to think about our country. In my ever so recent past, I've begun to reflect on what nation, the idea of nationness if you will, and how it affects my life. The nation is really a formal state one which carries laws that are governed as long as you/I as an entity occupy territory on said sovereign land. To call something a nation is to imply a self-governing body/bodies that create laws and enforce them. The sovereignty is thereby associated with territory and you/I may elect/be born as citizens of that state.

OK.... what does that mean? It means being a part of a nation/state is far different from the sovereign lords of old. In the era before the treaty of Westphallia, you owed allegiance to the lord/king/keeper of the realm. Their rulership was granted by God and they ruled with heavy hands. The nation/state made equality before the law a much more relevant possibilty. At the same time, nation/state would require our allegiance. Instead of going off to fight the petty war of some sovereign, we would pick up arms against another nation/state. We would defend our national territory from the curs of a foreign invader/oppressor. Many times, we, the United States of America, would fight over ideology or government systems. Fighting for one's country is far different than fighting for one's lord.

In the USA, we have also the Dream. The Dream is not about two cars in every garage. Its about the ideals that we as a nation/state were founded on. The idea of universal justice, oppurtunity, liberty, and freedom. Our nation was radical and took the Democratic apporach toward building the republic. The idea that many could be united as one was a powerful idea. Democracy as a large part of government practice had been for the most part dead since Caesar. To revive such a form of government was definitely a surprising move on the part of the newly made nation. But it was a part of the American Dream. For to have an aristocratic class that was heirachized and formal would work against all that men and women of the revolution had given their lives for. So... I'm one of those people.

On the 4th of July, I take the time to sit back and think about how unique we were. How radical, how liberal, how bold to make such decisions as to not have a king and rule by majority. Ever onwards, the Union faced crises that may have torn it apart. We have also had some our most exhilerating moments such as World War II and landing a man on the moon. But the idea of striving onwards whether to the prairies of the midwest or to desegregation, we are always pushing to move ourselves forwards.

The Dream still lives. Sure, its wrapped in the disguise of iPhones, iPods and I. but it is still there. So today, I lift a can of beer (Samuel Adams!) and salute... a lot of people. Here goes:

The Revolutionaries for coming up with this idea that is the USA.
The Confederates for reading that part about states' rights and taking it seriously.
The Yanks for forgiving the Rebs.
John Adams for being obnoxious and disliked (that cannot be denied).
George Washington for refusing to be a King.
Benjamin Franklin for conceding that the eagle would be a better than the turkey emblem for our country.
Thomas Jefferson for writing the Declaration of Independence (even if it wasn't that original). Thomas Paine for giving us all his two "sense".
Honest Abe for being forthright.
William Jennings Bryan for just being himself.
FDR for being the right guy at the right time. Only a cripple could lead a country out of its darkest hour.
The Greatest Generation. Words will never be able to convey what these millions of Americans did nor the grace and humility they did it with. Our nation will forever be shaped by these souls who came of age during the depression, went with little or none at all, and then ran off to free the world. To you I say thank you for being the Best Americans you could. Thanks for making this country what it is. Happy 4th of July!!!

And one last thing... Happy Birthday Steve Rogers, and thank you. A member of the Greatest Generation who did what countless others did but on the pages of a comic book. Be you dead or alive, Captain America, I still believe in that dream. And I miss ya. We need you now more than ever. To remind us that doing the right thing is more important than the best thing.

Now, bring on the fireworks

The President came to my town

Today the President visited the illustrious state of Minnesota. He flew in at 1405 on the dot. In completely unrelated news, people were taken to local area hospitals after complaining of throat and various irritations from fumes in the airport. The President spoke at the Marriot hotel here in Minnetonka about Health Care. Apparently, he thinks we pay too much for health care and that there needs to be more "transparency" in billing. As the president spoke, there were several people across the street protesting the President's visit along the lines of Health Care for all. At the same time there should be less Government involvement. However, I can't see how this policy can be implemented without such interverence.

The other part of his stop here in the Land of Too Many Damned Lakes was to stump for Michele Bachman in her campaign against Patty Wetterling for the 6th Congressional District in Minnesota. Wetterling, in case this is unknown, has dealt with the disappearance and apparent kidnapping of her son Jacob since 1989. She did not win her last bid for political office.

But aside from State politics, the Marines got the green light to recall 2,500 troops to active service from the CiC himself. I can see the tumult this will cause. I have friends who have served in Afghanistan and are now inactive and using their GI Bill to get their higher educations. I can only wonder what will happen to them.

Two other Bush bits before I move on to other topics of the day: Lebanon and Deliverance.

1. So the shaky truce between Israel and Hezbollah is more like a break to make more snowballs, but Bush has pladged $230M to Lebanon. However, that being said, an expert at the Brookings Institute believes that $1B (or thereabouts) is necessary to rebuild. I guess the rest of the world better pony up.

2. Bush pardons Moonshiner and bit player in the 1972 film "Deliverance". This article should be read just for the comments the moonshiner makes.

Ok, moving on to other fish: The Democrats. So this is an easy target I know, but bear with me. They all are. The Democrats say we should pull out of Iraq. Now is this just a way of continuing their stance from three years ago for the sake of voters? I would be one of the first to say "Hell yeah, I'm liberal" [enter spitting sound here] but this just bakes my moussaka. I was opposed to the war at the inset. I protested as well. But I knew in my heart that if we went through with it, we would have to do it 110%. 100% will not do and certainly 75% won't either. After pulling out of Lebanon in 1984 and abandoning revolters in Iraq in 1991, we have to stay the course. We have a reputation of cutting and running in the Middle East when things get hairy. If we ever want to be taken seriously on the global stage, this is the time to ensure it. Otherwise, everything we've done in Iraq would be for nothing and fruitless. So wisen up Dems. We need to stick around for better and for worse. Even though it sucks.

Another messed up coincidence. A poll released today says that while people believe the Democrats are better at handling the war in Iraq, they also think the Republicans are better at combating terrorism. Sure, they got Buchanan on their side. He wanted to build a giant fence to keep out the damned illegals. According to some, terrorists are now getting themselves smuggled into the US through the Mexican border. In the meantime, a party that wants nothing to do with a war would be the better one to run it? As the Nazi on 'Laugh In' would say, "Very Interesting".

One last note and its a very heartfelt one. The man who photographed the famous photo of Marines and a Navy Corpsman raising a flag on Mount Suribachi during the Battle of Iwo Jima, has died at the age of 94. Though his photo carried some controversy it nevertheless stirred feelings of patriotism and loyalty in soldiers, sailors and civilians. As a military kid, sailor, US citizen and amateur photographer, I salute a very noble man, Joe Rosenthal.